So let me get this straight: For EL9 you only support RHEL 9. AlmaLinux 9 may work, but as it’s not 100% binary compatible anymore, it’s unsupported.
For EL9 I have to buy a repository subscription. bummer. Not free anymore. The developer subscription won’t do it for us.
For EL9 I basically have to buy RHEL licenses, too, because “may support” basically means “we don’t support”.
For EL9 I have to contact sales to buy a repository subscription. Which only tells me “There was an error trying to send your message. Please try again later.” whenever or how often I try.
If I look into the network protocol of the browser tools I see the following JSON in the http response:
{
"contact_form_id": 267287,
"status": "spam",
"message": "There was an error trying to send your message. Please try again later.",
"posted_data_hash": "",
"into": "#wpcf7-f267287-p190474-o1",
"invalid_fields": []
}
So you are saying my attempt to contact sales to get a quote on a EL9 repository subscription is spam.
And I wouldn’t even get any support, i.e. I still would have to desperately post here and hope that someone answers, if ever. So basically, I can buy software for which I have to fix the bugs myself?
So that really makes me think if I need to move on to a different monitoring product. Icinga2 isn’t free anymore. It very much limits my choice of OS to a OS for which I have to pay, too, as I want to stay with EL based OS. I cannot even ask about a repository subscription because that is considered spam.
So I cannot use Icinga2 on EL9 even if I wanted to. Even if I wanted to pay for it, because it’s spam…
I don’t know if I should laugh or cry…